Received 24.12.2024, Revised 04.03.2025, Accepted 24.04.2025

Comparative analysis of load balancing methods based on SDN/NFV

Oleksandr Berestovenko

The purpose of the study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of using load balancing methods in networks based on Software-Defined Networking and Network Functions Virtualisation technologies. Particular attention was paid to comparing the effectiveness of different approaches to balancing, including centralised and distributed methods, and the use of intelligent algorithms for load forecasting. The analysis helped to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and their ability to adapt to changing network traffic conditions, considering such parameters as bandwidth, latency, packet loss, and energy efficiency. The paper discussed methods of load balancing in networks based on Software-Defined Networking and Network Functions Virtualisation technologies, which are important for ensuring the efficiency, scalability, and adaptability of modern networks. The key challenges faced by these technologies are described, such as the dynamism and unpredictability of traffic, resource optimisation, energy efficiency, and the integration of intelligent algorithms for load forecasting and energy consumption reduction. The study presents a comparison of various load balancing methods, including centralised and distributed traffic management, and the use of virtual balancers and adaptive traffic redirection algorithms. Particular attention was paid to analysing the impact of these methods on throughput, latency, packet loss, and energy efficiency under different traffic conditions. The role of machine learning in optimising load balancing processes, and the possibilities of integrating Software-Defined Networking and Network Functions Virtualisation into hybrid networks were considered. According to the results of the study, the use of balancing methods based on Software-Defined Networking/Network Functions Virtualisation can significantly improve network efficiency, reduce latency and increase throughput, while reducing energy consumption under high loads. Key results for Ukraine, where the integration of Software-Defined Networking/Network Functions Virtualisation into the telecommunications infrastructure can become the basis for improving the quality of services, optimising costs, and ensuring a high level of security in the context of digital transformation and infrastructure modernisation, are derived

network functions virtualisation; intelligent algorithms; resource optimisation; hybrid structures; energy efficiency
124-133
Berestovenko, O. (2025). Comparative analysis of load balancing methods based on SDN/NFV. Information Technologies and Computer Engineering, 22(1), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.63341/vitce/1.2025.124

References

[1] Adoga, H.U., & Pezaros, D.P. (2022). Network function virtualization and service function chaining frameworks: A comprehensive review of requirements, objectives, implementations, and open research challenges. Future Internet, 14(2), 59. doi: 10.3390/fi14020059.

[2] Alenezi, M., Almustafa, K., & Meerja, K.A. (2019). Cloud based SDN and NFV architectures for IoT infrastructure. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 20(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2018.03.004.

[3] Billingsley, J., Miao, W., Li, K., Min, G., & Georgalas, N. (2020). Performance analysis of SDN and NFV enabled mobile cloud computing. In GLOBECOM 2022 – 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference (pp. 1-6). Taipei: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/globecom42002.2020.9322530.

[4] Bonfim, M.S., Dias, K.L., & Fernandes, S.F. (2019). Integrated NFV/SDN architectures: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(6), article number 114. doi: 10.1145/3172866.

[5] Buyakar, T.V.K., Agarwal, H., Tamma, B.R., & Franklin, A.A. (2019). Prototyping and load balancing the Service Based Architecture of 5G core using NFV. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (pp. 228-232). Paris: IEEE. doi: 10.3233/jifs-189706.

[6] Chahlaoui, F., & Dahmouni, H. (2020). A taxonomy of load balancing mechanisms in centralized and distributed SDN architectures. SN Computer Science, 1, article number 268. doi: 10.1007/s42979-020-00288-8.

[7] Das, A., Nanda, P., Jain, R., Saini, T., Bhaskar, S., & Mohapatra, H. (2025). Security considerations of SDN networks during DDoS Attacks in load balancing. In Human impact on security and privacy: Network and human security, social media, and devices (pp. 123-140). Hershey: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-9235-5.ch007.

[8] Filali, A., Mlika, Z., Cherkaoui, S., & Kobbane, A. (2020). Preemptive SDN load balancing with machine learning for delay sensitive applications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(12), 15947-15963. doi: 10.1109/ TVT.2020.3038918.

[9] George, J. (2022). Optimizing hybrid and multi-cloud architectures for real-time data streaming and analytics: Strategies for scalability and integration. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 7(1), 174-185. doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2022.7.1.0087.

[10] Giri, N., Kukreja, V., Panchi, D., Sajnani, J., & Seedani, H. (2018). Performance evaluation of load balancing algorithms for SDN. In 2018 Fourth international conference on computing communication control and automation (pp. 1-4). Pune: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697762.

[11] Ibrahim, A.A., Hashim, F., Noordin, N.K., Sali, A., Navaie, K., & Fadul, S.M. (2020). Heuristic resource allocation algorithm for controller placement in multi-control 5G based on SDN/NFV architecture. IEEE Access, 9, 2602-2617. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047210.

[12] Jena, U.K., Das, P.K., & Kabat, M.R. (2022). Hybridization of meta-heuristic algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing environment. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 2332-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.01.012.

[13] Jiang, X., Yang, H., Yang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2021). Cluster load balancing algorithm based on dynamic consistent hash. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(3), 4461-4468. doi: 10.3233/jifs-189706.

[14] Kaur, K., Mangat, V., & Kumar, K. (2020). A comprehensive survey of service function chain provisioning approaches in SDN and NFV architecture. Computer Science Review, 38, article number 100298. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100298.

[15] Lakhani, G., & Kothari, A. (2020). Fault administration by load balancing in distributed SDN controller: A review. Wireless Personal Communications, 114(4), 3507-3539. doi: 10.1007/s11277-020-07545-2.

[16] Liang, S., Jiang, W., Zhao, F., & Zhao, F. (2020). Load balancing algorithm of controller based on SDN architecture under machine learning. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 8(6), 578-588. doi: 10.21078/JSSI-2020-578-11.

[17] Monir, M.F., & Pan, D. (2021). Exploiting a virtual load balancer with SDN-NFV framework. In 2021 IEEE international Black Sea conference on communications and networking (pp. 1-6). Bucharest: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ BlackSeaCom52164.2021.9527807.

[18] Moosavi, R., Parsaeefard, S., Maddah-Ali, M.A., Shah-Mansouri, V., Khalaj, B.H., & Bennis, M. (2021). Energy efficiency through joint routing and function placement in different modes of SDN/NFV networks. Computer Networks, 200, article number 108492. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108492.

[19] Nawaz, H., Ali, M.A., Rai, S.I., & Maqsood, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of cloud based SDN and NFV in 5g Networks. The Asian Bulletin of Big Data Management, 4(1), 206-216. doi: 10.62019/abbdm.v4i1.114.

[20] Nezami, Z., Zamanifar, K., Djemame, K., & Pournaras, E. (2021). Decentralized edge-to-cloud load balancing: Service placement for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 9, 64983-65000. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074962.

[21] Pidpalyi, O. (2024). Future prospects: AI and machine learning in cloud-based SIP trunking. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological University, 29(1), 24-35. doi: 0.62660/bcstu/1.2024.24. 

[22] Ray, P.P., & Kumar, N. (2021). SDN/NFV architectures for edge-cloud oriented IoT: A systematic review. Computer Communications, 169, 129-153. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.01.018.

[23] Rout, S., Patra, S.S., Patel, P., & Sahoo, K.S. (2020). Intelligent load balancing techniques in software defined networks: A systematic review. In 2020 IEEE international symposium on sustainable energy, signal processing and cyber security (pp. 1-6). Gunupur Odisha: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/iSSSC50941.2020.9358873.

[24] Song, Z., Sun, Y., Wan, J., Huang, L., & Zhu, J. (2019). Smart e-commerce systems: Current status and research challenges. Electronic Markets, 29, 221-238. doi: 10.1007/s12525-017-0272-3.

[25] Tache, M.D., Păscuțoiu, O., & Borcoci, E. (2024). Optimization algorithms in SDN: Routing, load balancing, and delay optimization. Applied Sciences, 14(14), article number 5967. doi: 10.3390/app14145967.

[26] Thajeel, T.G., & Abdulhassan, A. (2021). A comprehensive survey on software-defined networking load balancers. In 2021 4th international Iraqi conference on engineering technology and their applications (pp. 1-7). Najaf: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IICETA51758.2021.9717919.

[27] Tipantuna, C., & Hesselbach, X. (2020). NFV/SDN enabled architecture for efficient adaptive management of renewable and non-renewable energy. Open Journal of the Communications Society, 1, 357-380. doi: 10.1109/ OJCOMS.2020.2984982.

[28] Zarca, A.M., Bernabe, J.B., Trapero, R., Rivera, D., Villalobos, J., Skarmeta, A., & Gouvas, P. (2019). Security management architecture for NFV/SDN-aware IoT systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8005-8020. doi: 10.1109/ JIOT.2019.2904123.

[29] Zhou, Q., Yu, J., & Li, D. (2021). A dynamic and lightweight framework to secure source addresses in the SDN-based networks. Computer Networks, 193, article number 108075. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108075. 

[30] Zhu, L., Karim, M.M., Sharif, K., Xu, C., Li, F., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020). SDN controllers: A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation study. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(6), article number 133. doi: 10.1145/3421764.