Synergy of artificial intelligence, SDN, Zero Trust, and blockchain: An overview of new trends in secure network management
Oleksandr Pidpalyi, Oleksandr RomanovThe research relevance is determined by the need to create effective, transparent, and cyberattackprotected network management systems. The study aimed to systematise and critically analyse current approaches to combining artificial intelligence, software-defined networks, Zero-Trust architecture and blockchain to build adaptive, transparent and cyberattack-proof network management systems. A conceptual review of secure network management technologies was conducted using interpretative and comparative analysis of scientific sources, systemic and structural-categorical analysis of the characteristics of software-defined networks, Zero Trust architecture, blockchain, and artificial intelligence, and modelling scenarios for their application to improve the adaptability, transparency, and resilience of network systems in critical sectors of Ukraine. The results showed that the combined use of these technologies provides centralised traffic management, dynamic access policies, transparency of operations, and the ability to autonomously detect threats, significantly increasing the resilience of the network to multi-vector cyber-attacks. The study determined that the main problems of integrating these technologies into network systems are the opacity of artificial intelligence solutions, conflicts between the dynamism of models and the immutability of blockchain, high resource requirements, and the complexity of policy coordination in multi-domain networks. The implementation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence, hybrid architectures, off-chain solutions, model optimisation, and federated protocols has overcome limitations, providing a transparent, adaptive, and secure network system capable of responding effectively to threats and dynamic changes in the environment. The results showed that traditional solutions based on static firewalls and centralised control are limited in terms of response speed, attack detection accuracy and scalability. Integrated models combining artificial intelligence, software-defined networking, Zero-Trust architecture, and blockchain provide instant threat response, highly accurate attack detection, dynamic access control, automated auditing, and effective scalability, creating an adaptive, resilient, and transparent network system. The results of the study can be used to develop and optimise cybersecurity policies, automate access control and network event monitoring, and build scalable and transparent architectures of management systems
References
[1] Ajznblasm, Z., Deepika, A., Parameswaran, M., Satyanarayana, B., Srinivas, T., & Ramesh, P.S. (2025). Exploring Zero Trust artificial intelligence-based frameworks in large-scale dynamic networks for enhancing cybersecurity. In Proceedings of the international conference on computational innovations and engineering sustainability (pp. 1-7). Tamilnadu: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICCIES63851.2025.11032807.
[2] Alevizos, L., Ta, V.T., & Hashem Eiza, M. (2022). Augmenting Zero Trust architecture to endpoints using blockchain: A state-of-the-art review. Security and Privacy, 5(1), article number e191. doi: 10.1002/spy2.191.
[3] Alhilali, A.H., & Montazerolghaem, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence based load balancing in SDN: A comprehensive survey. Internet of Things, 22, article number 100814. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2023.100814.
[4] Alshehri, A., Tufekci, B., & Tunc, C. (2024). Identification management for Zero Trust through network analysis. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on computer systems and applications (pp. 1-6). Sousse: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/AICCSA63423.2024.10912537.
[5] Aramide, O. (2022). Identity and access management (IAM) for IoT in 5G. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 5, 96-108. doi: 10.53022/oarjst.2022.5.2.0043.
[6] Aramide, O.O. (2024). Zero-trust identity principles in next-gen networks: AI-driven continuous verification for secure digital ecosystems. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 3304-3316. doi: 10.30574/ WJARR.2024.23.3.2656.
[7] Ashfaq, F., Wasim, M., Shah, M.A., Ahad, A., & Pires, I.M. (2025). Enhancing security in 5G edge networks: Predicting real-time Zero Trust attacks using machine learning in SDN environments. Sensors, 25(6), article number 1905. doi: 10.3390/s25061905.
[8] AT&T Domain 2.0 Vision White Paper. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.att.com/Common/about_us/pdf/AT&T%20 Domain%202.0%20Vision%20White%20Paper.pdf.
[9] Azam, Z., Islam, M.M., & Huda, M.N. (2023). Comparative analysis of intrusion detection systems and machine learningbased model analysis through decision tree. IEEE Access, 11, 80348-80391. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3296444.
[10] Bashaa, M.H., Bhaya, W.S., & Al-aaraji, N.H. (2025). Integration of Zero Trust architecture and machine learning for improving the security of software defined networking: A review. Journal of Intelligent Informatics, Networking, and Cybersecurity, 1(1), article number 1. doi: 10.65445/3106-1192.1000.
[11] Batewela, S., Ranaweera, P., Liyanage, M., Zeydan, E., & Ylianttila, M. (2025). Addressing security orchestration challenges in next-generation networks: A comprehensive overview. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 6, 669-687. doi: 10.1109/OJCS.2025.3564788.
[12] Chaudhry, M. (2025). A systematic mapping study on security challenges in software-defined cloud computing. (Master’s thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland).
[13] Chowdhury, B., Jahankhani, H., & Subramaniam, S. (2023). Zero-trust blockchain-based digital twin 6G AI-native conceptual framework against cyber attacks for e-healthcare. In H. Jahankhani & B. Issac (Eds.), Cybersecurity and human capabilities through symbiotic artificial intelligence. ICGS3 2023. Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications (pp. 453-479). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82031-1_23.
[14] Chuzavkov, S. (2023). Ukraine’s largest mobile operator Kyivstar downed by "powerful" cyberattack. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/12/ukraine-largest-mobile-operator-kyivstar-downed-by-powerfulcyberattack/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[15] DoD Zero Trust strategy. (2022). Retrieved from https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/DoDZTStrategy.pdf.
[16] Dwivedi, R., et al. (2023). Explainable AI (XAI): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), article number 194. doi: 10.1145/3561048.
[17] El Koshiry, A., Eliwa, E., Abd El-Hafeez, T., & Shams, M.Y. (2023). Unlocking the power of blockchain in education: An overview of innovations and outcomes. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 4(4), article number 100165. doi: 10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100165.
[18] Gupta, A., Gupta, R., Jadav, D., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., & Shabaz, M. (2023). Proxy smart contracts for Zero Trust architecture implementation in Decentralised Oracle Networks based applications. Computer Communications, 206, 10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2023.04.022.
[19] Han, H., Liu, Z., Wang, X., & Li, S. (2021). Research of the relations among cloud computing, internet of things, big data, artificial intelligence, block chain and their application in maritime field. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1927, article number 012026. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1927/1/012026.
[20] Hashmi, E., Yamin, M.M., & Yayilgan, S.Y. (2025). Securing tomorrow: A comprehensive survey on the synergy of Artificial Intelligence and information security. AI and Ethics, 5(3), 1911-1929. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00529-z.
[21] ISO/IEC No. 27001. (2022). Information security management systems. Retrieved from https://surli.cc/mwmavy.
[22] Katsis, C. (2025). End-to-end frameworks for the specification, learning and enforcement of network-wide access control in Zero-Trust Network Architectures. (Doctoral thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA).
[23] Kudriashov, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and security in 5G and 6G mobile technologies. Computer-Integrated Technologies: Education, Science, Production, 54, 236-242. doi: 10.36910/6775-2524-0560-2024-54-29.
[24] Latif, S.A., Wen, F.B., Iwendi, C., Wang, L.L., Mohsin, S.M., Han, Z., & Band, S.S. (2022). AI-empowered, blockchain and SDN integrated security architecture for IoT network of cyber physical systems. Computer Communications, 181, 274-283. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.09.029.
[25] Li, H., Xiao, M., Wang, K., Kim, D.I., & Debbah, M. (2025). Large language model based multi-objective optimization for integrated sensing and communications in UAV networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 14(4), 979-983. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2025.3529082.
[26] Malik, A., Arshid, K., Noonari, N., & Munir, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity framework using machine learning for advanced threat detection and prevention. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 401-423. doi: 10.36347/sjet.2025.v13i06.005.
[27] Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse. gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/M-22-09.pdf.
[28] Mishra, S. (2023). Blockchain and machine learning-based hybrid IDS to protect smart networks and preserve privacy. Electronics, 12(16), article number 3524. doi: 10.3390/electronics12163524.
[29] Nagarjun, A.V., & Rajkumar, S. (2024). Exploring the potential of deep learning and blockchain for intrusion detection systems: A comprehensive review. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 33(16), article number 2430007. doi: 10.1142/S0218126624300071.
[30] Narayanan, S. (2025). AI-driven anomaly detection for telecom cloud security. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 25, 228-238. doi: 10.63282/3050-922X.ICRCEDA25-125.
[31] Nikitchenko, V.S. (2024). Research on trends in the digital transformation of business structures based on Industries 4.0 and 5.0. (Master’s thesis, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine).
[32] Ozkan-Okay, M., Akin, E., Aslan, Ö., Kosunalp, S., Iliev, T., Stoyanov, I., & Beloev, I. (2024). A comprehensive survey: Evaluating the efficiency of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques on cyber security solutions. IEEE Access, 12, 12229-12256. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3355547.
[33] Pemmasani, P.K., Gudepu, B.K., & Gonugunta, K.C. (2025). Unified AI command console for cybersecurity: Multi-AI integration with minimal manual intervention. TechRxiv. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.174802397.73696913/v1.
[34] Rahman, S., & Perumath, N. (2025). Implementing Zero Trust management in IoT environment-challenges and solutions: Scoping review. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1955680&dswid=-2231.
[35] Shah, A.S., Karabulut, M.A., Kamruzzaman, A., Alharthi, D., & Bradford, P.G. (2025). A survey on artificial intelligence and blockchain clustering for enhanced security in 6G wireless networks. Computers, Materials & Continua, 84(2), 1981-2013. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.064028.
[36] Speith, T. (2022). A review of taxonomies of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 2239-2250). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3531146.3534639.
[37] Svensberg, P. (2023). Software-defined zero-trust network architecture: Evolution from Purdue model-based. (Master’s thesis, University of Turku, Turku, Finland).
[38] Telefónica. (2017). Telefónica’s UNICA architecture strategy for network virtualisation. Retrieved from https://www. telefonica.com/es/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2021/03/Telefonica_Virtualisation_gCTO_FINAL.pdf.
[39] Tiwari, S., Sarma, W., & Srivastava, A. (2022). Integrating artificial intelligence with Zero Trust architecture: Enhancing adaptive security in modern cyber threat landscape. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 9(2), 712-728.
[40] Vorokhob, M.V. (2023). Models and methods for improving enterprise security policy based on the Zero Trust methodology. (Doctoral thesis, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine).