Received 26.11.2025, Revised 23.02.2026, Accepted 26.03.2026 Published 20.04.2026

Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for personalising educational content in distance learning

Vitalii Yanishevskyi

The aim of this research was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms for the task of personalised educational content recommendation in distance education systems. The study was of a theoretical-experimental nature and was performed using a synthetic dataset comprising 10,000 student profiles, constructed based on the structural characteristics of leading distance learning platforms. The dataset covered three groups of features: demographic, behavioural, and content-related, replicating key patterns of student interaction with the learning environment. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Multilayer Neural Network methods revealed clear quantitative differences between the models. The highest classification results were obtained for the Neural Network (accuracy = 0.91; F1-score = 0.90). The ensemble-based Random Forest model provided high stability and accuracy (accuracy = 0.89; F1-score = 0.87). The Support Vector Machine method showed balanced performance (accuracy = 0.86; F1-score = 0.83), while the Decision Tree exhibited the lowest effectiveness (accuracy = 0.72; F1-score = 0.70), confirming the limitations of interpretable models in multidimensional data. An additional systematic analysis, performed using semi-quantitative indices for six algorithm characteristics, reflected the overall suitability of the models for personalisation: the Neural Network scored 23 points, Random Forest – 21 points, SVM – 19 points, Decision Tree – 17 points. These scores align with the classification metrics and confirm the advantages of models with pronounced non-linearity and ensemble structure. The Multilayer Neural Network demonstrates the highest efficacy for deep content personalisation, Random Forest serves as a universal model for large-scale educational platforms, the Support Vector Machine method is optimal for courses with clearly segmented student groups, while the Decision Tree is advisable to use as an interpretable analytical module. The practical significance of the study lies in forming a scientifically grounded approach to selecting algorithms for building adaptive educational trajectories and improving the effectiveness of digital education

digital environment; Learning Management System; hyperparameter optimisation; neural networks; synthetic dataset
46-59
Yanishevskyi, V. (2026). Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for personalising educational content in distance learning. Information Technologies and Computer Engineering, 23(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.31649/vitce/1.2026.46

References

  1. Ahmed, E. (2024). Student performance prediction using machine learning algorithms. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2024(1), article number 4067721. doi: 10.1155/2024/4067721.
  2. Bhaskaran, S., & Marappan, R. (2023a). Design and analysis of an efficient machine learning based hybrid recommendation system with enhanced density-based spatial clustering for digital e-learning applications. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9(4), 3517-3533. doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00509-4.
  3. Bhaskaran, S., & Marappan, R. (2023b). Enhanced personalized recommendation system for machine learning public datasets: generalized modeling, simulation, significant results and analysis. International Journal of Information Technology, 15(3), 1583-1595. doi: 10.1007/s41870-023-01165-2.
  4. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, article number 100068. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068.
  5. Chandrakant, N.S. (2023). Gamified learning and NLP: Enhancing student engagement through AI-driven interactive education models. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 9(1), 813-824. doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.1.0496.
  6. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., & Kegelmeyer, W.P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953.
  7. Chen, W., Shen, Z., Pan, Y., Tan, K., & Wang, C. (2024). Applying machine learning algorithm to optimize personalized education recommendation system. Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, 4(1), 101-108. doi: 10.53469/jtpes.2024.04(01).14.
  8. Dhananjaya, G.M., Goudar, R.H., Kulkarni, A.A., Rathod, V.N., & Hukkeri, G.S. (2024). A digital recommendation system for personalized learning to enhance online education: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 34019-34041. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3369901.
  9. Ezzaim, A., Dahbi, A., Aqqal, A., & Haidine, A. (2024). AI-based learning style detection in adaptive learning systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 731-769. doi: 10.1007/s40692-024-00328-9.
  10. Jafari, D., & Shaterzadeh-Yazdi, Z.S. (2024). Transforming education with AI: The development of a personalized learning algorithm for individual learning styles. Journal of Algorithms and Computation, 56(2), 135-150.
  11. Kanchon, M.K., Sadman, M., Nabila, K.F., Tarannum, R., & Khan, R. (2024). Enhancing personalized learning: AI-driven identification of learning styles and content modification strategies. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 5, 269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcce.2024.06.002.
  12. Lhafra, F.Z., & Abdoun, O. (2025). A comparative study of learning style model using machine learning for an adaptive E-learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 84, 36779-36798. doi: 10.1007/s11042-025-20657-w.
  13. Li, D. (2024). An interactive teaching evaluation system for preschool education in universities based on machine learning algorithm. Computers in Human Behavior, 157, article number 108211. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108211.
  14. Liu, T., Wu, Q., Chang, L., & Gu, T. (2022). A review of deep learning-based recommender system in e-learning environments. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(8), 5953-5980. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10135-2.
  15. Luan, H., & Tsai, C.C. (2021). A review of using machine learning approaches for precision education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 250-266.
  16. Ma, F. (2025). Learning behavior analysis and personalized recommendation system of online education platform based on machine learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, article number 100408. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100408.
  17. Motlagh, N.Y., Khajavi, M., Sharifi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on the evolution of digital education: A comparative study of openAI text generation tools including ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, and Ernie. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.02029.
  18. Motorina, V., Kravets, H., & Tsynova, M. (2025). Analysis of the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in creating personalized learning materials for higher education institutions. Pedagogical Academy: Scientific Notes, 15. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14842883.
  19. Naseer, F., Khan, M.N., Tahir, M., Addas, A., & Aejaz, S.H. (2024). Integrating deep learning techniques for personalized learning pathways in higher education. Heliyon, 10(11), article number e32628. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32628.
  20. Pathak, D., & Kashyap, R. (2022). Electroencephalogram-based deep learning framework for the proposed solution of e-learning challenges and limitations. International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 15(3), 295-310. doi: 10.1504/IJIIDS.2022.124081.
  21. Rouzegar, H., & Makrehchi, M. (2024). Generative AI for enhancing active learning in education: A comparative study of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in crafting customized test questions. ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.13903.
  22. Sayed, W.S., Noeman, A.M., Abdellatif, A., Abdelrazek, M., Badawy, M.G., Hamed, A., & El-Tantawy, S. (2023). AI-based adaptive personalized content presentation and exercises navigation for an effective and engaging E-learning platform. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(3), 3303-3333. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13076-8.
  23. Shevchuk, B. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence into virtual educational environments: Personalization of informatics training for vocational teachers. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 4(1), 90-98. doi: 10.46299/j.isjel.20250401.09.
  24. Song, C., Shin, S.Y., & Shin, K.S. (2024). Implementing the dynamic feedback-driven learning optimization framework: A machine learning approach to personalize educational pathways. Applied Sciences, 14(2), article number 916. doi: 10.3390/app14020916.
  25. Soui, M., Srinivasan, K., & Albesher, A. (2022). Intelligent personalized e-learning platform using machine learning algorithms. In P. Lokulwar, B. Verma, N. Thillaiarasu, K. Kumar, M. Bartere & D. Singh (Eds.), Machine learning methods for engineering application development (pp. 110-126). Soest: Bentham Science. doi: 10.2174/97898150791801220101.
  26. Taylor, R., Fakhimi, M., Ioannou, A., & Spanaki, K. (2024). Personalized learning in education: A machine learning and simulation approach. Benchmarking, 32(7), 2662-2689. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2023-0380.
  27. Villegas-Ch, W., García-Ortiz, J., & Sánchez-Viteri, S. (2024). Personalization of learning: Machine learning models for adapting educational content to individual learning styles. IEEE Access, 12, 121114-121130. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3452592.
  28. Zadorina, O., Kachan, T., & Zadorin, V. (2025). Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence tools for creating adaptive learning courses. Pedagogical Academy: Scientific Notes, 16. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15073276.
  29. Zhang, Q. (2023). Secure preschool education using machine learning and metaverse technologies. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), article number 2222496. doi: 10.1080/08839514.2023.2222496.