Received 11.01.2024, Revised 19.04.2024, Accepted 30.05.2024

Method and information technology for ranking alternatives based on visual ternary comparisons

Volodymyr Kolodny, Valentyn Zubko

A new method and corresponding information technology of ranging alternatives have been developed, which are based on con- ducting and further analysis of visual ternary comparisons and do not require any numerical or verbal evaluations from an expert or decision maker. Visual ternary comparisons are the arrangement of three alternatives on the shelves of preferences according to the principle "the better the alternative is, the higher its location is." In order for the process of identification of preferences to be reliable, visual and to activate a fast system of intuitive thinking, the decision-maker or expert is suggested to arrange the presented alternatives on the computer screen according to his preferences. Further numerical interpretation of visual ternary comparisons and methods of obtaining cardinal resulting rankings and ordinal resulting rankings of the entire set of alternatives are described. To increase the reliability of ranking results, it was proposed to use two different forms of numerical interpretation of visual ternary comparisons: the method of line sums (additive convolution) and the Saaty scale (multiplicative convolution). In the developed method, the requirement for the transitivity of preferences is mitigated, and the expanded context of comparisons of alternatives statistically smoothes minor errors and allows to diagnose gross errors. Information technology for ranging alternatives based on visual ternary comparisons which consists of nine interconnected stages is described. An exam- ple of the application of the developed method and information technology in the case of identification and correction of conflicting ternary comparisons is considered. The developed method and corresponding information technology are promising for use in various fields that require ranging of alternatives in qualitative and quantitative evaluation (decision-making, psychology, pedagogy, management, marketing, expert evaluations etc.).

method of ranging alternatives, information technology, visual ternary comparisons, fast intuitive thinking, conflicting comparisons, preference shelves, ordinal rankings, cardinal rankings
23-31
Kolodny, V., & Zubko, V. (2024). Method and information technology for ranking alternatives based on visual ternary comparisons. Information Technologies and Computer Engineering, 21(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.31649/1999-9941-2024-59-1-23-31

References

[1] Katrenko, A.V., & Pasichnyk, V.V. (2020). Decision-making: theory and practice. Lviv: New World – 2000.

[2] Hnatienko, G.M., & Snytyuk, V.E. (2008). Expert decision-making technologies. Kyiv: Maklaut LLC.

[3] Kolodnyi, V.V. (2003). Three-level rankings and their application to identify preferences. In Control and management in complex systems (p. 238). Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM-Vinnytsia.

[4] Kolodnyi, V.V., & Zubko, V.V. (2014). The method of non-criterial structuring of a set of alternatives using the analysis of ternary three-level rankings. In Proceedings of the ninth international scientific-practical conference "Internet-Education-Science" (IES-2014) (pp. 13-14). Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[5] Zubko, V.V. (2015). Decision-making system based on the method of analysis of ternary three-level rankings. In XLIV scientific and technical conference of professors and teaching staff, employees and students of the university. Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[6] Kolodny, V.V., & Zubko, V.V. (2016). Application of Gestalt rankings to identify the advantages of OPR. In Proceedings of the 10th international scientific-practical conference “Internet-EducationScience” (IES-2016) (pp. 43-44). Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[7] Zubko, V.V. (2016). Information technology for visualization and identification of preferences. In Proceedings of the tenth international scientific-practical conference "Internet-Education-Science" (IES-2016) (pp. 58-59). Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[8] Kolodny, V.V., & Kudryavtsev, D.S. (2018). Information technology of visual modeling and processing of ternary Gestalt rankings. Information Technologies and Computer Engineering, 48(2), 26-34. doi: 10.31649/1999-9941-2018-42-2-26-34.

[9] Lavrov, M.V., & Kolodny, V.V. (2020). A mobile application for visual ternary ranking of alternatives. In XLIX scientific and technical conference of VNTU divisions. Vinnytsia: VNTU.

[10] Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.

[11] Thaler, R.H., & Sunstein, C.R. (2022). Nudge. Longon: Penguin.

[12] Kolodny, V.V., & Zubko, V.V. (2023). A class of methods of ranking and non-criterial evaluation of objects based on visual ternary comparisons. In Youth in science: Research, problems, prospects (МН-2024). Vinnytsia: VNTU.